My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SP-070
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Special Use Permit File PLZ 02100
>
SP 001-100
>
SP-070
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2007 11:47:06 AM
Creation date
2/7/2007 12:44:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Council Proceedings <br />City of Ne.Brighton <br />April 13, 6 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />'>i- <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />Doug Peterson, 553 9th Street NVJ, owner of the <br />building stated that the building area was <br />30 x 40 feet. He added that the amusement center <br />would be well managed. <br />Councilman Fisher questioned whether sufficient parking <br />was available for the proposed use. <br />Motion by Werdouschegg, seconded by Hardt to close <br />hearing <br />5 ayes - 0 nayes - carried <br />Motion by Hardt, seconded by Werdouschegg to <br />direct administration to prepare a resolution <br />denying SP-70 including the following findings: <br />1. Parking requirements are not met; <br />2. The center would be too closely located <br />to the liquor store; <br />3. There is potential for unsightly debris; <br />4. It may create a nuisance by way of noisej <br />5. It would be a place of potential mischiefj <br />6. Area residents had expressed opposition. <br />5 ayes - 0 nayes - carried <br /> <br />Attorney stated hearing remained properly called <br />The City Planner reviewed his report and the <br />Planning Commission recommendations. <br />Mr. Charles Nolan, applicant, was present to <br />respond to Council questions. <br />Councilman Werdouschegg stated that the two <br />portions of the contour map did not have grade lines <br />which met. <br /> <br />Mr. Nolan stated that the final contours are anticipated <br />to be basically the same as existing contours. It <br />was noted by the staff that surveys were taken at <br />different times but that the drainage indicated on <br />the contour map was essentially the same as <br />currently exists. <br /> <br />Mrs. Bourquim. 506 2nd Avenue N.W. stated no objections <br />to the proposal but stated concern that hauling of <br />materials could create a dust problem and that loads <br />should be watered down. <br />Mr. Nolan stated that there may be some problem with <br />incoming fill in this regard. <br /> <br />Mrs. Howard Thompson, 518 2nd Avenue NVJ., questioned what <br />route would be taken by hauling vehicles. <br />Mr. Nolan responded that they would come along the west <br />property line of the Shell station, onto County Road E2 <br />and then on to 35W. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />Close <br />Hearing <br />9:49 <br /> <br />Adm. to <br />Prepare <br />Resolution <br />SP-70 <br /> <br />SP-68 <br /> <br />E-Z Mini <br /> <br />9:50 to <br />10:17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.