Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, . <br /> <br />LAND USE. The end use of the excavated area is perhaps the major long-term <br />concern associated with excavation operations. Wi II the land be usable within the <br />goals of the community? This is a question which must be answered. To provide <br />that answer, BRW wi II develop rough schematic plans of alternative forms; of <br />development of the excavated site. This exercise will permit an evaluation of the <br />site's flexibility for development, and of how much effort wi II be needed to develop <br />the excavated site. <br /> <br />ROADS AND TRAFFIC. The operation of the borrow site will require the use of <br />surrounding road systems by trucks hauling excavated material from the site. Their <br />weight and movement characteristics will have an impact on traffic flows in the <br />area and on road surface conditions. Based on existing data, BRW wi II provide an <br />evaluation of these potential effects. <br /> <br />VISUAL QUALITY. The visibility of exposed cut slopes has traditionally been a <br />concern where borrow operations are to occur. BRW would develop a generalized <br />description of the areas of the city which would be exposed to views of the cut <br />slopes. Such an analysis would enable city decision-makers to evaluate the borrow <br />pit's visual impact in a quantitative manner. This study would be performed using <br />the city's standard topographic base sheets or U.S.G.S. maps, whichever is more <br />available. The analysis would also include suggestions for buffering the visual <br />impact. <br /> <br />HISTORY / ARCHAEOLOGY. The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (8 <br />Stat. 915 as amended) delegates responsibility for identifying and protectin'g <br />historic and archaeologic sites to the states. In Minnesota, the agency with this <br />authority is the Minnesota Historical Society. This agency recommends that it be <br />consulted prior to beginning excavations of the type concerned here. BRW will <br />draft a letter to the State Historic Preservation Officer requesting official <br />evaluation of the site. This step requires little effort or expense but assures that <br />valuable archaeologic sites are not unknowingly destroyed. <br /> <br />PUBLIC SAFETY. Excavation operations of this type normally present hazards to <br />public safety, while with proper precautioos can be fully mitigated. BRW wi II <br />identify those hazards which are apparent given the limited amount of time avail- <br />able for study. BRW will also identify potential mitigation techniques which the <br />City may wish to incorporate into the special use permit. <br /> <br />DELlVERABLES AND SCHEDULE <br /> <br />" BRW will provide copies of the finished report for each member of the City Council <br />and Director of Community Development. The report will be provided in the form <br />of typewritten, xeroxed, bound copies. We estimate that between 2 and 2Yz weeks <br />will be needed to complete the report, except for the response from the Historical <br />Society. Typically, it requires 3 to 4 weeks to receive a response of this type from <br />the agency. However, their findings could be considered separately and the <br />responsibility for action on the findings could be delegated to City staff as a <br />condition of permit. <br />