SP-088 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

"" '" SP-88 Page #2 The applicant is also requesting that this mo~e1 remain at this site for an 18 month period. A time period of one year seetllS adequ'ate. In order to insure the City that the model will be remov~d, approval of the model unit should be on condition that if the model is not removed after the one year period it will become the property of the Ci ty to di spose of as it sees fi t or the City should require that the applicant post a bond. At the time when the Planning Commission reviewed the request the applicant was uncertain as to whether or not the water and sewer services could be provided to this site this fall. Since that time the applicant had indicated to staff that the utilities will be installed this fall so that the unit will hav~ the necessary services. PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION AND RECOMMENDATION EXTRACT FROM MINUTES BOARD OF REVIEW REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 18, 1979 Gene Tierney, representing RCE Corporation was present to answer any questions. Chairman Schmidt questioned the necessity of a,model unit on that site. . Commissioner Lang voiced a concern on whether or not the necessary public utilities could be secured yet this fall. Mr. Tierney was unsure of the scheduling of utilities but indicated that it is the intention of the firm to have the necessary utilities for the site. Motion by Schmidt, second by Sande to adopt a resolution recommending approval of SP-88 and to amend the resolution to include a number 6 under Findings of Fact to read "that since the building is for public use the appropriate utilitiessh6uld be provided" and that a #3 be added under BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED to read: "that the applicant investigate and make the necessary agreements to secure the utilities." Motion by Lang; second by Baker to amend the motion to add a #4 under BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED to read: 4. That the model onit not house sales personnel until the site is serviced with the necessary utilities. 5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, amendment ca rri ed.