Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />t <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />t <br /> <br />Transport Tire, Inc. <br /> <br />-5- <br /> <br />March 1,. 1983 <br /> <br />Boring 2 encountered 5 ft 6f a fine sandy silty fill which was frozen at <br /> <br /> <br />the surface to 3.5 ft. Underlying the sandy silt from 5 to 10 ft was a <br /> <br /> <br />brown silty fine sand fill in a medium dense to loose condition. From 9 to <br /> <br /> <br />11 ft was a buried topsoil consisting of silty sand mixed with some clayey <br /> <br />sand in a dense condition. From 12 to 16 ft was a brown sandy silt in a <br /> <br />medium dense condition. Underlying this sandy silt from 16 to 20.5 ft was <br /> <br />a gray silty sand in a dense condition. <br /> <br />Please refer to the specific soil borings in the Appendix for conditions at <br />individual boring locations. <br /> <br />Water Level Conditions <br /> <br />Water was encountered at depths varying from 14.5 to 15 ft below the <br /> <br /> <br />existing ground surface while drilling the soil borings. Based on these <br /> <br /> <br />findings, it is our opinion that the level of the long-term hydrostatic <br /> <br /> <br />ground water table was located at approximately elevation 889 ft at the <br /> <br /> <br />time of the subsurface exploration. Fluctuations in the level of the <br /> <br /> <br />long-term hydrostatic ground water table should be anticipated with <br /> <br />variations in precipitation, evaporation, surface runoff and infiltration. <br /> <br />ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />There are two approaches to the analysis of this project: 1) the low risk <br /> <br />approach, which would be for foundations which could have settlements in <br /> <br />STS Consultants, Ltd. <br />