Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />ATTACHMENT A <br /> <br />STAFF COMMENTS <br />, <br /> <br />,,' <br /> <br />This request for a special use permit first appeared on the CDunii1 <br />agenda on November 24, 1981. At that time the major issue before <br />the Council was whether or not the applicant wDuld agree to meet <br />all Building Code requirements which required substantial alterations <br />with the interior and extetior of the structure. Staff's repDrt and <br />prepared resolution in November recommended denial .of SP-10l (see <br />attached resolution). This recommendation was based on the Planning <br />Commission's concern over the character of the neighborhood being <br />affected by the numerous alterations that wDuld diminish the future <br />conveTsion 'of-th-e- structure back to a single family'dwelHng. <br /> <br />After reviewing the rough plans prepared to meet Building Code <br />requirements, staff is even mDre concerned that the propDsed <br />alterations and use does nDt meet the conditions of the Planning <br />Commission resolution and the standards for granting a special use <br />permit (Section 8-130) fDr the following re~sons: <br /> <br />1. That the numerous cDde violations will require numerous <br />structual modifications which will alter the "residentia111 <br />character of the structure; <br />2. That because of its location -in- the cDmmuni-ty t.hat -such <br />exterior/interior modification will have an adverse <br />affect on adjoining properties; <br />3. That such a use results in additional encroachment of <br />quasi-public use with increased traffic and noise into <br />an established residential area; and <br />4. That the Building Code required ,improvements will alter <br />the house in such a manner as to diminish its future re- <br />use as a single family dwelling. <br /> <br />Since November the applicant has been researching and trying tD get <br />the approvals to spend the money to make the required Building CD de <br />mDdifications. This time delay was requested by the applicant. <br />However, because of the time period since the original Planning <br />Commission review and the preparation of the plans detailing the <br />imprDvements that were not available at the time of Planning <br />Commission consideration, staff recDmmends that the Planning <br />Commission be directed by the CDuncil to re-consider the application. <br />