My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-093
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 001-100
>
VN-093
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2007 6:00:39 PM
Creation date
2/20/2007 11:11:02 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ ,~ ... y <br />parking areas appear to be defined by curbing. The maneuvering-areas 'of <br />the, proposed parking lot appear to be more than adequate. <br />The relatively small,`1~,000 square foot structure is substantially below <br />the maximum allowable .structural coverage area for tha,zaning district. <br />The proposed landscaping plan combines an excellent selection of varieties <br />for year-round appearance. Small sodded areas around the building are. <br />enhanced 'by Low Juniper shrubs defining the site and accentuating the <br />structure corners. Black Hills Spruce are used at key points on the-site <br />to :enhance the general layout and the structure. The general planting plan <br />appears to be more than adequate and well thought out, <br />pLANNTNO COP~IlwIrSSION: landscape Plan -. Fortune Investments - September 5, 1972 <br />Thee:-planners notes indicated-that the site was nearly level and easily visable <br />from all. roadway approaches. 'Phe proposed aayout of the site appeared to <br />be welltho~ught aut and the selection of landscape materials. was excellent for <br />year-round appearance of the proposed development.. <br />Primary discussion by members of the Planning Commission centered on the <br />proposed refuse area and it was suggested that this area should be paved in <br />concrete as opposed to asphalt as indicated on the pl.ttn. The question was <br />praised as to whether or not a curb cut was- proposed at this location and the <br />developer indicated that none was requested. (Planners Note under Section <br />10.5:15 "the maximum number of driveways to a single property shall be two <br />(2) unless a especial permit for a greater number is obtained from the <br />Village Council.) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.