1988-01-12 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I I I Council Meeting Minutes January 12, 1988 If council holds the first reading of the ordinance, Benke noted the current issue may be resolved by the second reading and publi- cation of that ordinance declaring a moratorium. LeFevere pointed out that both the resolution and the ordinance prohibit the granting of various kinds of permits that may be ne- cessary for uses involving outside storage, they also prevent the expansion of existing uses involving outside storage. Those may include uses which do not require a permit approval by council. Benke also asked for input from the Economic Development Commis- sion as to the impacts on those items and various sites along the Old Highway 8 corridor; suggests holding a first reading tonight and ask staff to expedite the review. Motion by Williams, seconded by Gunderman, to WAIVE THE READING AND HOLD THE FIRST READING OF AN INTERIM ORDINANCE RESTRICTING THE DEVELOPMENT OR EXPANSION OF USES INVOLVING EXTERIOR STORAGE. Brandt stated she is not comfortable with the proposed ordinance and asked that it be amended to insert Boerner Building System's name; Benke stated it can be included in the second reading. 5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried Locke reviewed staff report concerning a quick take resolution on properties in Phase I of Brighton Corporate Park; however, because the developer has not yet completed all of the required action to date, staff is suggesting action not be taken on the resolution this evening. Staff has been talking to residents and property owners in the Phase I area and it is possible we will not need to use any condemnation to acquire the property; however, we may need, at some point, to adopt such a resolution to provide staff with an outside time limit so it is certain we can acquire the property on a timely basis for the developer. Benke asked if there is any value to including conditions on the other conditions such that, if we need to, we can proceed; Locke indicated it could be done but, from a practical standpoint, was not sure it would make much difference whether we waited to take the action on January 26th or if it were approved tonight contin- gent on the pieces being completed. Locke indicated the key date is when we actually file the petition with the court and then no- tify all of the property owners of the condemnation and, in any case, that would not happen until right after January 26, 1988. In response to Benkels question, Locke indicated staff has advised the property owners that staff would have the quick take authority if it is needed. James Senden, developer, stated he is working as quickly as pos- sible; and does not see deferral of this action until the next meeting will affect their project in any way. Page 14 Brighton Corporate Park - Phase I Quick Take Authority Report 88-18