Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- 3 - <br /> <br />Planning Commission Recommendation (12--18-73); <br />Motion by Daniels, seconded by Parham, to recommend denial of VN--113.0 <br />Mahn stated that he favored narrowing the access to a width for one <br />automobile and posting it for an entrance only with no exit allowed. <br />Daniels stated his belief that the conditions for a variance are not. <br />met and that the granting of a curb cut would create traffic cir- <br />culation problems. <br />Motion carried .2-1 (Mann) <br />Mann stated that his previously suggested configuration would allow <br />some access and minimize problems. <br />Parham stated that if a curb cut is approved it should follow the <br />suggestion by Mann, <br />Daniels stated that the reasons for his vote were the same as he <br />had given at the October 16, 1973, meeting where the landscape and <br />plot plan was reviewed. <br />Motion by Mann to recommend as an alternative design, should the <br />Council approve a curb cut, the narrowing of the driveway and its <br />posting as an entrance only. <br />Motion failed for lack of a second. <br />In response to a question by the vice-Chairman as to whether they <br />wished to comment on the sign request, Daniels and Mann indicated <br />that they did not.