Laserfiche WebLink
VI~T-117 - 2 - April 23, 1974 <br />yard parking as covered in Cahpter XII. <br />Daniels noted that this is a very exposed area and asked if putting <br />screening strips in the fence were being considered. <br />Mr. Nolan stated that their major concern was to hold down costs since <br />this was only an interim development. <br />`?~'~ant~.ina Commission Recommendation (rlarch 19, 1974: <br />N1.otion by Daniels to recommend approval of VN-117 with the comment <br />that the pE~titioner wishes to use lii.s from yard for open storage and <br />that this is not parking in the normal sense of the word. <br />P•i~i-ion withdrawn, <br />Motion by D~niels to recommend approval of VN-117 with the following <br />conuitions: <br />1. The landscape and plot plan for the original development of this <br />parcel be revised to show the requested addition, together ~~~ith <br />the proposed landscaping for the entiY•e parcel. <br />2. That the petitioner be required to supply s7.atting in the proposed <br />fence or a screening landscape treatment so as to screeiz all fov.r <br />s~.des of the contents of the proposed open air storage. <br />Moi;ion failed for lack of a second, <br />PQotion by Rohling, secnnded by Parham, to recommend approval of VIA-117 <br />but to recommend that the need for a variance be reviewed and that if <br />it i_s found apr-+rol.~riate to then recommend inGtead that tine chGrge <br />proposed be handled by an amendment to the land:~cape and plot plan for <br />the parcel showing ?andscaping, fencing and lighting, and that the <br />site development conform to City codes in all respects. <br />Motion failed, 1-2 (Daniels, Parham) <br />T.~Iotic>n by Parham, seconded by Ror,ling, to recommend ap;?ro~~al of~•~GP;-17.7 <br />on the condition that an amended landscape and plot plan for the <br />Barrel be submitted for review by the Planning Commission prior to the <br />psblic Y~na.rin.ci. <br />t~totion carried, 3-0 <br />