VN-117 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Pak~'.i.- rI2a.r. i.ng V1'-. 7.1 i f3:1Q P~2, A~,r_ it 23, LJ7`r APPL.T.CA~?T: Nc]_:~n 3roG. LOCATI!~~1: Sou trx,;~'~ty: q~aalra.r;t Co. F'.c]. E-2 and I3 ~?~T . APPLICAr7T'S Variance from Ssctio?1s 1:1--120 (g) and 7.?--030 (c) to REQUEST permit front yard par',;inq i_n an ir_dustri?1 district. PLANDiZi~G DISCTY;,STG~t: At the time of ~:pproval of the mini-s•tora.ge facility, t:l=ry ap?licant was told to combine the property in c~uest::.or. with the naYcel to the south (on which t"±s mi;zi-storage btxildinrs are locate]) i.n o_der t;o have street access. By doing t,ii:. a.nd construct.i.tlg the buildings, all the property to tha nor_•th becar*ia the fro;~•t yard, This is a sizable area and t~~e ~ppli^_ant woalcx ]_?:~ t:o p~,•t i.t to s<rne use, The aroa contains vary poor so:ii and construction of a huila~_ng on the site raigYit not he ecozcmicaa.ly feasible at 1-his fi-ime. As an interim usP, tae develoFPr e~cul:] like to dPVnlon a parkir_q lot for recreatior_s1 vehicles, boat traiiors Gnd Simi I.ar tyF<.s o-. vehicles. Under Section 8-O10 (a) 3 parkins; lo:s a1:P a permi 'r.t.cu use in B-1 districts and by Sections °-020 (b) and 9-C1a0 (a) that L.: e would also be ~ermittad in industrial districts. According t-.o Sections 10-120 (n) ar.d 12-030 (c) parking i:: not Fer_'mit-.ted in front yarc]s i_~i industrial G~.strict5, «nd a.s iradicateci abovE, tl~.e proposed parki.rg 1~:=t wcnld be i;Z the front-. yard. It is not clear that it ?vas this ty;±e of parking :iot cchich tho Co=incil meant to ever by these requirercents but the wor~]ing in {~h~ ordin~zr_ce, ~eGpecialll,• the definition of a parking lot in Section 12-°1?.0, seems to cover this pro~;ns~.l. The Planning Comrtissie:l rerommenc?~tion on this variance w?u conditiorea cn a landscaFe and p1c?t plan being r~vie~~-ed by tre*n prior to the p«blic hearing. The app?_ic~~rrt has been unablo to have a lu.ndscape and plot plan rrepared as yet. It should re note:3 that tn.e Zoning Ccae dogs not require a landucape plan tihere tr'i~::~.e ~.s no building construct:io-;. .P3:~:lni:~g Co-r.;:iissio:~_Con:~idoration_(T"-sch_ 1_9, :tQ7'!-) i~r. Charles rTclan appeared representing the nppli.cant. Rohl.ing raestioized whether the neec] for a variance was ~3'..'.'.^.CP_iat. MafTor Brcrnunder questioned o;hether t'~e a.pp].icant's proposal was front