Laserfiche WebLink
-At the present time, the applicant-has secured-.the w~:itten consent.:. of <br />7 of 12 property owners within 200`. He expects to have the other <br />5 signatures by the time of the Councilm~eting. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION (May 21, 1974):.:. <br />-The Chairman. read the background dscussiom.' <br />Mr. Charles Bergman appeared ,to speak in his own behalf. He stated <br />that a chain link fence would surround the concrete pad and that the <br />.grades on the property are what they are because there is a'pipeline <br />running under the property:. He also stated that he bought the house <br />'on the condition that the pad be constructed; that he doesn`t <br />know whether apermit-was takenout for the pad :and that he didn't <br />know'at that time.. that he couldn't put up a fenced <br />In response to a question by Parham as to how his request met the <br />three conditons.`for a variance., Mr. Bergman stated that the... pad would <br />be used as a play area as well as tennis-and basketball court. He <br />stated .that the fence would keep kids in a s~.fe enclosure cry they <br />weren't'running into the street chasing balls axed that if one of <br />the kids were-hit by a car, it would be undue hardships <br />PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (Mav 21, 1974): <br />Motion by Bohling, seconded by Harty,. to recommend approval-of <br />VN-121 with the condition that no opaque. material ever be installed <br />on the fence to obstruct the-view and that chain link fencing should <br />be the :only:-typeof material allowed. <br />Cha.i~.xc~3n P~~harn rFitsratad her cor_cern th~:au ~`he c~.~_~#~on^- of the <br />pad could not justify the .variance .because it cau:id ser~~o a.~ a <br />convenient echnique to circumvent the law. <br />PREVIOUS COI7NCIL ACTIONS <br />June_11, 1974 <br />Attorney stated hearing was properly called. Mr.'Bergma~n was <br />pr-went o answer Council questions. He stated the lc~t wad und~.zly <br />high because of Standard oil pipeline .along Oakwood requiring a 3 <br />-foot elevation above the pipeline. <br />Motion by Eagon, seconded by Anderson to close hearznc~. <br />5 ayes -:0 naves -carried <br />Motz.on by Rebel.en, seconded by Bromander to deny r~:t?:~fw ,L'G.~ ~~~'-3-21. <br />on .the basis that. the conditions for a variance do not e.~ia•t and <br />- 2 <br />