Laserfiche WebLink
requirements'on fences. He stated that i~ is the apparent intent of <br />.these provisions to profect adjacent property owners fromhaving <br />•their view of the street screened. Mayor Bormander stated that it <br />is not clearfrom the Ordinance ,what: the actual intent is. Chair- <br />man Parham stated that the 'intent should be, clarified. <br />-The Mayor reviewed the Council's consideration of Mr. Putnam's <br />request and noted that the `Council Motion, which failed, was in- <br />.tended as a compromise between the.. property owners. <br />Mr. Putnam stated that he wishes. to have the fence approved,.-as <br />requested and noted that it represents a compromise on his part. <br />Planning Commission Recommendation (7-16-74): <br />Motion by Bohling,-seconded by Dlugosch to recommend approval <br />of VN--125.' <br />Chariman Parham stated that if it seems that the intent-of <br />the law was to prevent the. obscuring of view, the law itself: is <br />obscure and should be clarified . <br />Motion caxried, 4-0. - <br />