Laserfiche WebLink
The two parking spaces.. that'wer.e installed. in front of the <br />buildingwere installed in error at the .time the .office bua.ldinet . <br />was cor_strixcted. There acre in violation of the Code because they,. <br />e~;tend into the front yard, however; the applicant would like there. <br />to remain because. of the need. for additional parking in the area <br />near`ahe office. whey occur in an area that is.curb~d adjacent <br />to the cul-de-sac and is obviously at the end of a.dead end street <br />where their extension into the yard is much less noticeable than <br />it would be in other locations. - <br />[nTe see no problems that would iae caused by the requests , All <br />the issues that had come up in regard to the plans.,were resolved <br />at the time of the previous application. <br />rrTe have been notified by the applicant and the Pollution Control <br />Agency that there. is some question as to whether the Foundry sand <br />used to fi l the property. is possibly polluting the ground water ~.n <br />the area.- Tr~hile this issue is still' under stud~r, we• do not feel <br />that it affECts the status of the applicant's variance request. <br />Obvcixsly, the. PC~~ v~~.ll be m~.~ing. the tectini.~:al deter~nina~:iona <br />regarding t~iis issue and requiring the applicant to canform t,o <br />whatever requirem:~rits they have in this regard. ` <br />Planning commission .CansaCderation, 8'-1J=75< <br />tnTickland read the background discussion. <br />The City Manager presented and reviewed a letter from the PCA <br />regarding possible ground water contamination"by the fill on the <br />site. <br />Planning Cs~mmission Recoit~mendat.ion, 8-19-?5a <br />.Motion by Fredrickson, seconded by Partyka, to recom~:end <br />approval of VN-148 and LP-25 conditioned on the e~~tension of concre•~- <br />curbing to a point even with the front of the Foundry building. <br />.Motion carried, 6-0 <br />