VN-150 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City of New Brighton Nov. 25, 1975 Councilman Eagon asked whether the tn7indsor Green Association had been contacted regarding the assessment. The staff noted that they had not been, but further noted that they were present at the time the contract wa.s approved which included the various dates for Council review. Ms. True noted to the Council that National Biocentric would accept additional input up to 10 AM Dec. 1, 1975, but not beyond. Motion by Eagon, seconded by Rebelein to authorize National Biocentric tb prepare the final .Environmental Assessment including the changes noted in the Building and Planning report received above, to include the factual errors noted by the City Attorney noted above, to include the factu~~: errors noted by Councilman Rebelein above and. to further .include an explicit . statement of New Brighton assumption regarding local significance and significant environmental impact and to further direct administration to forward copies of the assessment to h~indsor Green Association and the developer .and to inform the Association and the developer of the deadlines of Neca Brighton and to inform the Windsor Green Association and the developer of the review process conducted by the ESC 5 ayes - 0 nayes - carried Motion by Rebelein, seconded by Eagon to receive letter .New Brighton from Richard M. Nattell, dated Nov. 15, 1975 Furnitur 5 ayes - 0 nayes - carried Mr. Richard Na.ttell, and Mr. Eddie Rybak noted to the ~~ Council that they did not believe it proper. to place `~ requirements on a business not involved directly in the signing of Mr. Nattell's operation. Mayor Bromander indicated that since the building was under single ownership, the Code required the entire signing be reviewed. The staff noted to the Council some concern as to whether the variance had been properly processed in that the property owner had not signed the application. The City Attorney advised the Council that the ordinance clearly required the property owner to sign the variance request - 5 ayes - 0 nayes - carried Motion by Rebelein, seconded by Anderson to move for reconsideration of VN-150 adopted at the November 12 Council meeting. 5 ayes - 0 nayes - carried Motion by Fisher, seconded by Anderson to declare that the action regarding VN-150 was void on the basis that the owner of the building had not signed the application form and to direct administration to refund the application fee to the applicant. 5 ayes - 0 nayes- carried