My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-150
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 101-200
>
VN-150
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2007 5:15:27 PM
Creation date
2/22/2007 3:21:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~: - , <br />F <br />covNelz~ coraslnER~~zo~ <br />Sign Permit <br />June 14, 1975: <br />RecX,uest, Council authdrzaton of sign permit for one wall-.sign. <br />and permission to repaint the existing ground sign and <br />wall sign <br />.Applicant: `New Brighton ~~rnture Inc. <br />:Location:., 948 5th Ave. raw <br />;Size of Existing Sictns: Ground Sign - 8` x 19' _ -152 sq. "ft. <br />15~i' High <br />Furniture :Store Wall Sign 5th eve: - 2'4" x 32' -= 75`sq:ft. <br />_ Eddie's Corner Bar Wa11 Sign 5th Ave.2'b" x 36'8"=92 sq.ft. <br />Project Sign - 5' x 5~ 25 sq.:ft. <br />[fall Sign. -Over Corner Entrance -: 3' x 5' = 15 sq'. ft. <br />Edde's Corner Bar Wall Sign 10th St: 2'6" x 19'8"=49-sq.ft. <br />Furniture Wall Sign 10th St. '- 3' x 20'2" _ 60 sq. ft: <br />Total Signing = 443 square feet <br />Size of Proposed Sicxns 5' x 7' = 35 sq, ft. <br />Discussions <br />-The property in question is a building of multiple occupancy • <br />having individual entrances. Both businesses have frontage on <br />both 10th Street and 5th Ave. NW. The .property has 77 feet. of <br />frontage along 10th Street and 121 feet of frontage. on-.5th Ave., <br />allowing a total signing area under the existing .ordinance of <br />412:,square feet. By our ,computation, existing signing exceeds <br />that permitted by the existing ordinance and, therefore, is <br />itself-non-conforming. The additional sign requested. would, <br />therefore, not be permissible. The existing ground sign <br />on the property is also•non-conforming in that it-does not have. <br />the required 30-foot setback from the street. <br />Regarding the conformance of the existing signs and the <br />..proposed sign with the proposed ordinance, it can be summarized <br />by saying that-there-are numerous deviations. The property in <br />question is, as previously stated, a building of multiple occupancy ` <br />having individual entrances. On that basis, it would be <br />permitted. one ground sign identifying the building only: The <br />existing,. ground sign in its present state and also. as it is <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.