Laserfiche WebLink
~,~ _.° <br />New Brighton Furniture -2- June: 10, 1975 <br />.- <br />proposed-'to be repainted, would not meet this requirement,. <br />Also with the revisions to the proposed sign ordinance :adopted <br />at the-last meeting, each .tenant in the building would be allowed <br />o have one sign containing a maxmum,of 5 items of informations: <br />.The. tenants in the building, obviously, will each have more. than <br />one sign as-they have,or are proposing to have, signs on both <br />street sides. In addition, the. signs in question exceed the <br />limit on the number of items of information. The furniture <br />stone wall sign on 5th Ave. has seven :items of :information. <br />Thee bar `sign on 5th Ave. has- 10 items of information., The <br />furniture-store wall sign on.l0th Street has 1-:but.tYie`sign <br />'that 'is proposed to be added to that sign ~rou d have 4 more.: <br />:The bar wall s-ign on 10th Street has 9 items. of information. <br />The wall'°s-ign above the door on the corner has 4 items of infor- <br />mation and the projecting sign had 4 -items of information. <br />In addition, there are numerous permanent window signs in the <br />bar that may exceed the 25% limit and..a so contain a ,considerable- <br />number of .items of information, at least 2.0 on the 5th Ave ... side. <br />-The furniture store also has window signs on 10th Street which <br />seem to be of a permanent nature which contain approximately- <br />28 items of information. Lastly, it: appears that the wall signs <br />on the`furniture store and bar, 5th Ave. side.,.-exceed the 40% <br />of the..signable area that would be allowed and that the wall sign: <br />for the bar on the 10th St, side also exceeds the 44% that would <br />be allowed.. Further, the furniture store wall sign on the lath <br />St, side that currently exists-would exceed the 40% of the area <br />when the additional sign requested by the applicant is added to it. <br />In summary then, the signing currently existing on-the property <br />exceeds. that permitted under the present ordinance and would violate- <br />virtually-every provision of the proposed ora~inance applicable <br />to signing in this case. <br />