Laserfiche WebLink
VN-150 -3-: <br />As-nearly as we have been able to determines, theothern~.i- <br />conform.ties regarding sig~.irc~ are as fallovas: <br />1. 5th Ave. side wall sign "Eddie's Corner Bar" - coves <br />more `than.`ane signable areaand exceeds tn.e percentage of a <br />s ignahle area which may be co~~ered with. a s i <xn <br />2e Wall sign above side entrance door to furniture store <br />on,5th Ave. side - the sign in this..Iocation does notface a <br />public treet and so is not allowed. ..The parking lot on this <br />side of the building does not contain-at least 10 parking spaces. <br />3, W~11 sign above entrance door Eddxe`s Corner Bar -either <br />this sign or othex signs-would not be allowed because only, one <br />wall sign 'is allowed per business. In addition, the signable area <br />in this location is 14.25 square feet and the. sign itsalf is <br />approxmate7.y 13.5 square feet so that it exceeds. the allowable <br />percentage of th.e signable area. <br />4. Wa11,.sign 1(3th Sto side Eddie `s Corner Bar - this sign - <br />would also be, in violation of the ordinance as it exceeds the <br />boundaries of a sign~~ble area and almost tom ll:ycovers-the signable <br />area over which it is located thereby exceeding the allowable <br />percentage of the signable area-that can be covered. <br />5. Furniture s-tore -sign 10th St. side --this sign would be <br />conforming on its size. Only ore wall-sign is allowed, however, so <br />that :either this sign or the .other-wall sign is non-conforming for <br />that rsason. <br />~: <br />6. Projecting sign Eddies' Corner Bar -.projecting signs are <br />no longer allowed under the new sign ordinance. <br />7. All wall and permanent window signs on Eddie's Corner <br />_Bar -.the_ amout of information contained on these signs exceeds <br />the 5 items of information per side allowed under the Code. <br />In cor_sidering its recommendation on this variance, the <br />Council will want to consider the question of whether the existing <br />signing is excessive and whether or not it should be brought <br />-into greater conformity with the ordinance before allowing the ~ <br />erection of new signs. Because only the tenant making the request <br />and the owner of the property are involved, it would seem possible <br />to reach some agreement regarding .removal of some non-conforming. <br />signing. Some of the n©n-conforming sic~ningthat might be considered <br />