Laserfiche WebLink
V1V-150 _ -3-" , , <br />As nearly as we have been able tadetermine, the other non- <br />conf"ormities regarding~~sgning are as follows: <br />1. 5th-Ave. side wall sign "Eddie's Corner. Bar" -covers <br />more than bne signable area and exceeds the percentage of a <br />signable area which may be_covered with a sign.' <br />2e Wall' ign above side entrance door ta~furniture store: <br />on 5th Ave, side -the sign in this location does not face a <br />public street and so is not allowed. The parking lot on ..this <br />side of the: building does not contan'at least 10 parking spaces. <br />3. Wa11 sign above entrance door Eddies-Corner Bar -either <br />this sign or other signs would not be allowed"because only one <br />wall sign is a1l.owed per business. 7n .addition, he signable area <br />im-this location is 14_.25 square fee-t ,and the sign itself is <br />approximately 13.5 square feet so that it exceeds the allowable <br />percentage of `the signable area. <br />`4. Wall..sign 14th 5t. side Eddie's Corner'Bar -.this sign <br />would also be in violation of :the ordinance as it exceeds the . <br />boundaries of a signable: area-and almost totally covers the signable <br />area over which it is located-thereb~r~exceeding the allowable <br />percentage of thesignable area. that can be .covered. <br />5. Furniture store sign 1©th St. side -this sign would be <br />conform~.g on its size. Only one wall sign is allowed, however, so <br />that either this-sign ox the other wall sign is non-conforming for <br />that reason. <br />-6. Projecting sign Eddies' Corner Bar -projecting signs are- <br />no longer allowed under the new sign ordinance. <br />7. All wall and permanent window signs on Eddie's Corner <br />Bar -the-amout of information contained on these signs exceeds- <br />the 5 items of information per side allowed under the Code. <br />In considering its recommendation on this variance, the <br />Council will want to consider the question of whether the existing <br />signing is excessive and whether or not it should be brought <br />into greater conformity with the ordinance before allowing the <br />erection of new signs. Because only the tenant making the request- <br />and the owner of the property are involved,. it would seem possible <br />to reach some agreement regarding removal of some non-conforming <br />signing. Some of-the non-conforming signing that might be considered <br />