Laserfiche WebLink
VN-154 -3- <br />~' In regards to the warrants for the variance, attention is <br />directed to the applicants-statement pertaining to the :need ,of <br />`the signing... We would note that this particu lay case is similar` <br />to other developments in New Brighton where thee.-lots and homes are <br />knot readily visible from a major road. <br />he sign, as depicted on `the drawing, does not appear to be <br />particular y offensive. Of more concern is the proposed locatipn <br />for the sign. The setbacks as shown would be 10' from the Long <br />:Lake Road right-of-way and;25'::.from the`Poppyseed Drive right-of-way: <br />Ube would suggest that. if he variance is approved, that the sign <br />be located slightly further to the east. Thiswould eliminate <br />any possible obstruction at the .intersection.. <br />Planning `Commission Cons ideration - (~pr i l 20, 1976) <br />The City Planner reviewed his commentso <br />Marcel Ebensteiner, representing the applicant, was present to <br />answer•.questions. <br />Mr. Eibensteiner indicated that the identification sign was needed <br />to alert potential customers to the homes in the Brittany Beach <br />area. Mr. Eibensteiner noted that the Brittany Beach area is <br />somewhat hidden and many people are not aware of the locations <br />Harty. asked what type of construction sign would be allowed if <br />the sign were on the applicants property. <br />The City Planner noted that one unlighted sign may be displayed <br />for a residential project for the initial offering of ten. or more <br />new dwelling units for a .period of not to exceed two years. <br />It was also noted. that the size of the sign would have to be in <br />conformance :with the Table of Basic Design Elements,-except that <br />the area of the sign may be increased to 61 square feet so long <br />as it is situated no closer than 150 feet from the property <br />line of an occupied residence that is not part of the development. <br />Fredrickson indicated that a time limit for the sign may be desirable. <br />Motion by Partyke, seconded by Fredrickson, to recommend approval <br />of VN-154 sc~h the follawiag conditions s <br />1. That-the sign be erected and maintained for a period not. <br />to be exceeded 16 months; <br />