My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1987-09-22
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Minutes - City Council
>
Minutes 1987
>
1987-09-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2005 6:12:15 AM
Creation date
8/10/2005 2:32:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />September 22, 1987 <br /> <br />With regard to the bog, Proper noted the residents determined <br />eight hours of labor would cost $1,000; if it does not seem to be <br />working, the effort would cease. If it appears to be working, <br />they would continue to spend the $2,000 to see what can be accom- <br />plished. <br /> <br />Proper indicated the proposed resolution, based <br />asks to continue the project from November 1987 <br />and to authorize a special tax levy of $3,234.38 <br />cial taxing district. <br /> <br />on the majority, <br />to November 1988 <br />against the spe- <br /> <br />Tom Heckathorne, 1858 - 26th Avenue NW, stated he considers the <br />bog removal to be experimental and non-businesslike because the <br />backhoe operator is a friend of one of the residents and there is <br />no protection if something goes wrong; was informed that the ma- <br />jority rules because there is no Lake Association; and he has no <br />desire to spend the funds until he sees other alternatives. <br /> <br />Benke asked if Proper would administrate the $2,000 expense for <br />the backhoe; Proper indicated he would. <br /> <br />Benke asked about standard liability and bonding requirements; <br />Proper indicated through the quote process the vendor would need <br />to be bonded and insured. <br /> <br />With regard to the question of the absence of a homeowners associ- <br />ation, Benke recalled this matter is on the agenda because several <br />years ago council agreed to administer this project on behalf of <br />the residents and, in that process, those residents agreed to the <br />creation of a special assessment district; and explained it is <br />that authority the council uses to levy the assessment. <br /> <br />Allen Cox, 1842 - 26th Avenue NW, challenged the bog removal as- <br />sessment for a $2,000 experiment, not because he thinks it is a <br />bad idea, but because he believes it extends beyond the original <br />intent; he understands Clean Flo became involved in the narrowly <br />defined project to clean up the pond and hopefully to get rid of <br />the bog which did not happen. Cox believes the $2,000 assessment <br />would set a precedent as there is no charter setting up proce- <br />dures, by-laws, or decision-making rules (agreement of 13 should <br />not impose levy on all 24 residents). <br /> <br />Benke asked how Cox would propose to pay for it; Cox responded the <br />amount could be equally between the residents that wanted it. <br /> <br />As an extreme example, Cox continued that in the five years from <br />now 13 residents may decide they would like the lake totally <br />drained, it would happen and he could not be guaranteed it would <br />not happen; Benke stated the neighbors do not levy the taxes on <br />the properties, the council does if it agrees with the majority. <br /> <br />Benke believes we need to have more discussion as to recalling <br />whether or not this was part of the initial discussion because it <br />has always been a concern; not sure why a neighborhood association <br />has never been formed; if the creation a formal process is pro- <br /> <br />Page 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.