Laserfiche WebLink
SIN-1_. 5 7 "'' - <br />displ.ayina the nar~~e of=the building only< ?~ ground signr <br />?f_ erected, could hOt P},'~PPd 20f.ent in height nor ~6 square <br />feet in area ~ 4faa11 signB i~` `~rectFC?, could not exeec <br />?0°~ of the selected sgnab~.p a~~ea. Inter.,'_or. activities <br />coup? be identified together on an 'integrated wall directory, <br />with identification limited one square foot per activ?ty. <br />This c~~a1l directory must be places' within a signablP area; <br />~_ , Tnlhether the iaarrants are prps^nt anr~ justify the variance <br />Section 1?•-2?0 inrl:ic~tes that the'necPssary elements in ' <br />relation to sign variances ar_eo <br />1 Practical c?i_ffcultes <br />'? Unnecessary hardships <br />Resu l.ts ineons istent s~zith the genera 1 purpose' of <br />Chapter X~`3 <br />In addition, it is stated thato <br />].~ Special circumstances involving sizF, shape and <br />topographye or location must be attached to the <br />property <br />Z, The grantcing of the variance shall. not constitute: <br />special privilege. <br />~: jahat the consequences may be should additional enants <br />move into the building who also dAsire signing Tn~h;ile the <br />applicants have indicated that the building is now fully <br />-occupied, we would. just acid teat any. modification to existing <br />signs, such as changing panels on the goound s i_gn, ~aou ld <br />require variances if there are non-conforming signs on the <br />property. Our concern is .for the Councils position ,on <br />futur? sign requests folio~~~ing action on. this immediate <br />request. <br />Planni.~q Commission Considerat~_on _(r~ay__1S, 1976) <br />-The City Planner rPViewed his comments noting that this was <br />a building of multiple occupant' having shared entrances. <br />Mr. & Mrs. T~Iilson, of the R. T. ~^?ilson, Co. , and Liana Eagon, <br />attorney f_or the applicants, were present to answer qu?stions. <br />Mrs. Eagon noted that the building in question has three c?ist:inct <br />