Laserfiche WebLink
vN-1 ~ 7 -~ - <br />entrances anc~ that the interiors of the building are not con iguous <br />from one section to another Th~a, Mrs :~ac~on noted, is not- like <br />most other ?~uildings of m~tltiple occupancy with share~.entr_ancPs <br />Mrso Eagon mentionec? that :'the R. T c~~lson, Co. is a new business <br />in New Brighton anc? that Mr Wilson was a resident of the City. <br />It v~~as further noted -Ghat as a." ne~~~ business it c~oPS neQd some type <br />oT designation so that sus ome"rs are aware of its location. The <br />proposal is to Yeplace signs on the pylon faith ~~ T Wilson signs and <br />place one sign on the building; above an ,existing wall sign These <br />signs, Mrs.. Eagon noted, would not increase the sign clutter on. the <br />property. It was stated that the applicants felt the ws-wants were <br />present to justify the variance because there would bA a hardship <br />:cor the R T . W i l'son, 'Co i f they could not identify ahe it business e <br />Mrso Eagon a7.so noted that the building was now fully occupied so <br />the concern for future signs may be alleviatPc~e <br />Mr T,~Tilson indicatedthat they would appreciate the variance <br />approva 1 f_or obvious` bus mess reasons a <br />Fredrickson noted that this building is a perfect example of <br />tahy them is a sign ordinance ?~'_rPC~rick_son further noted that this <br />Yequest may afford the opportunity to bring the Pxistang signing <br />more into conformance. <br />Mr. Wilson indicated that thAy would be happy to comply with <br />any future sign amortization ordinance but that they do need the <br />signs right nosy . Mr tr7i ison sa is that they wou Id g lack ly take down <br />the signs if such an ordinance were passed, <br />Neil Herly, 125 North Court, stated that he felt the City Council <br />anc~ Administration was spending to much time enforcing the sign <br />orc7inancP ~,vhen the citi yens of Ne*a Br~_ghton do not carte ? f signs <br />are-erected Mr. HPrly further states' that the City Council and <br />Administration should spend thAir time and money on projects that <br />are more. important to the citizens to New Brighton., <br />Partyka noted that there are people who ar_e concerned-with <br />signing and that is the reason why the current sign ordinance was <br />adopted. <br />Mr. Herly stated that this building is much-.more attractive <br />,,with its aigning than is the McDon3ld's building <br />Fredrickson suggested that Mr. Herly work up a petition to <br />present to the City Council if he feels the present sign ordinance <br />should be amended. Fredrickson noted that the Board of Review <br />