VN-164 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Council Proceedings i~., 4 .%~~ity , of New Brighton ~ ' 'Oct. 12. 1976 Mayor Bromander added that the variance was for property that backed on County Ditch 2 and it_had grade problems on 7th Street. Motion by Hardt, seconded by FisY~er to close hearing. Close 5 ayes - 0 nayes- carried Hearing Motion by Sender to approve. variance subject to the variance not exceeding 5 feet with a minimum o:E ].0 .feet sideyard setback and subject to the garage not exceeding 22 feet in width, Motion failed for lack of a second. .Motion by Hardt, seconded b_y Fisher to direct administration to prepare a resolution denying VN-163 based on the following findings of fact.` 1. That undue hardship has not been shown because a one-car garage can be built on premises.. '~\ 2. Unique circumstances have .not been shown since.. this situation could happen elsewhere within the City. 3. Unique circumstances applying to this property have not been. shown. 3 ayes - 2 nayes (Werdouschegg, Senden) - carried Motion by Werdouschegg to approve a variance for a 14 foot sideyard setback to allow cc:fnstruction of a garage accessing to 7th Street. Motion failed for lack of a second, Attorney stated the hearing was properly called. VN-164 The Planner reviewed the planning report and Planning Commission recommendations. 9:41 to 10:28 Nlr. Jack Bell attorney representing the applicant, reviewed the requested variance. He stated the change in the operation of the station to self-service operation required unique signing. He mentioned that: one of the two fuel price signs discussed in the planning report had been removed. He noted that many signs along Old Highway 8 were not properly setback. He noted removal of billboards would not improve the appearance of the property as they acted as a screening device to property west of the subject property.