VN-165 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

:,~- „ - ^~- Oct. 19,..1976_ Cauncilman Hardt asked how wide the new lot would be at its widest point. ivIx. Peterson stated- the 1.ot ~,~ould be 125 feet in width at .its maximum width. Councilman Hardt'asked which .way the new house would face. 1~Ir." Peterson. indicated the house would face the lake . Councilman Hardt asked if there were any barriers between the lots. Mr. Peterson noted.. that there is a row of pines .separating his father's property and the lot to the ease. the City Planner noted that any homes-constructed 'in,the area would have to-.have a basemenic elevation of at least 3 feet. higher than the regional flood 1eve1 of ..Lang Lake. Mr. Peterson indicated that a dr~.wing was being prepared showing `this elevation where the home could be located. i~r._Peterson said his intention is just tq divide this rather unusual parcel in a manner in which he can also build ahouse.." Mr. Peterson also indicated that they. had tal'sed to the neighbor to the east and.-that the neighbor had not expressed any objections. Fredric~cson'stated that she felt there was a legitimate concern for. traffic. Fredrickson noted that traffic near this curve is dangerous. Councilman Hardt asked'if there could be just-one driveway.. Isaac. Petersen indicated that this could be done but that an easement would be'necessary. Partyka said that he sees no problem with the two driveways. Partyka not=ed that common driveways can create problems in terms of access a^ights and .maintenance. Fredrickson stated that she felt there would be problems in getting financing for the house.. if there is not a separate driveway.` Fredrickson also noted that she was uncomfortable with the odd shaped parcels,` 0 Partyka stated that he saw no problem with the shape of the lot. .Partyka said that this wasa rather uniqu.~ parcel which is the: aftermath of a number of-other events and that he felt this waa a good way to handle the ..problem.