Laserfiche WebLink
-. ! <br />-7- Qct. 19,.1976 <br />Frec~ri.ckson stated that evsr~lone with oZceb homes .and large lots <br />on Long Lake .may have similar requests< <br />~ ayns - ~ Hayes (Fredrickson, t~Iickland) -motion failed. <br />t~??_cklanc~ noted that his reasons far voting ~`gainst the motion were <br />the it ~~aould appear to be inconsistent ~~.7ith past actions regardiz~zg <br />irregular shaped parcelso <br />Fredrickson stated. that her_ reasons for voting against the <br />motion were that it would crate a traf'f?~ ha2ard on I.~ong Lake <br />P.oac1 and because -the subdivi_si on of this n~.ture a.s bad planning. <br />i~io-tion by Partyka, .seconded by Bohling, to send this zratter to the <br />Coy?ncil without recommendation. <br />ayes - 0 Hayes - carried <br />ConcP~t Discussion, Faa_th Ch~•isti~n ftefarir.°d Church <br />~'he City Planner rev='_c-we~1 his report not vng that as a .concept. <br />discussion formal action on t:he part of 'case Planning Commission <br />c~,as not required . <br />Members of the Church z~ere present to discuss their plans. <br />Mr. Doug. Johnson,. church mczni~er, noted that when the cul-de-sac <br />roe l~ A Street Baas plattea, it was not extended into the church <br />p~opc~rty. <br />Fredrickson asked if the church would sell the property t: a <br />devclop~r. <br />Mr. Johnson-said the church plans were soi~lewhat unclear but that. <br />they would. be sold just as lo'cs. <br />.Bohling asked if the. lots to the west were developed. <br />Mr. Johnson replied that these lots were ?wilt on. TTr> Johnson <br />also noted there is a considerable amount of pedestrian traffic <br />over this part of the church property. r~Ir. Johnson stated that <br />;_f two homes were built on these lots, the traffic zziay be reduced <br />for all homes on 16 A Street. He also noted that the church <br />~.aas thinking of piecing soma earth berms along the .western boundary <br />lino of the. parking lot.. <br />