VN-165 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

h --7- pct. 19,_ 1926 redrickson state~~ th~;~ ev~~~youne with 'ol~er `hornes and large .lots on Long Lake may have s?m.?aar regvestse '~ ayes - +7 Hayes (Frc,c',ric:'t.son, ,tick-land} - mc~ta.on failedo °v??_cklanc~ noted that his reasons for: voting agaixist the motion were r.hat it ~aoulc~ appear to b~ inconsistent ca~.th past actions regarding irregular sh~.ped parcels. ~'rec~rickson stated that her reasons for voting against the motion were. that it-would create a traf-fic hazard on Long Lake P.oad and because :the subdivision of this nature is lead p]_anning. Mo'zion by Partyka, secondec? by Bohling, to send this. rra. tter to .the Council. without'~ecommendation. -` ayes - 0 Hayes - ca~riec~ ConcerJt Discussion, Faith Christian Refo?°r~r~ C~:~urch .The-:City .Planner. revir-.-..wed his report..noting that. as a concept. discussion formal action Gn t~ze part ,of ..the Planning Commission was not required. members of the Church here present to discuss their plans. Mr. Doug Johnson,..-church mem?aer, noted than i~hen the r_ul-de-sac for 16 A Street was plattedD it was not extended into the church p:~roperty. Fredrickson asked if-the church would sell the property t. a developer, Mr. Johnson said the church plans were somecahat unclear but that they ~~~ould be -sold just as lots. Bohling:.asked if the lots to the west were developed. Mr. Johnson...replied that these lots were built on. P:Tr. Johnson also noted there is a consic'erable amount of pedestrian traffic over this part of the church-property. T-1r0 Johnson stated that it two homes were buil~c on these lots, the traffic may be reduced.- for all .homes on 16 A Street. He also noted that the `church ~. t.~as thinking of placing °snmc earth berms along the western boundary ~ line of the parking lot.