My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-166
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 101-200
>
VN-166
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2007 4:48:22 PM
Creation date
2/23/2007 3:02:01 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1. _ <br />' - <br />-' <br />P'uELiC ti.C;~1it'I3G <br />VN-16.6 <br />1 ~ December 28, 1976 (8:05 P.M.) <br />Request: VN-166, Variances to permit subdivision of property <br />with lots havngless than ,the required minimum width. <br />Applicant: Eugene F. Skiba <br />Location: 8th Street NW west. of 11th Avenue <br />Zonin R--1 , <br />Code Requirements: <br />Section 10-010 states. that the minimum-requirements for-lot,. <br />dimensions in ~ single family residence district are: <br />1. 75 feet-wide at established building setback line.- <br />Sections 2-700 and°1.1-040 state that the crucial points of <br />a variance request are: <br />1. Undue hardship <br />2. Unique circumstances, and <br />3 e Applying to property. <br />It "is further stated that a variance is not justified unless <br />a.Il three elements are present in the case. <br />Discussion: <br />The applicant is requesting a variance in conjunction with <br />his application for preliminary plat approval to subdividF a <br />presently unplatted parcel into four lots with each lot having <br />74.5 feet in width.. <br />The-.applicant has notes in his application that the parcel <br />-'only has access off of 8th Street and that because of the sizable <br />assessments, development into at 1Fast 4 lots is required. <br />The Zoning Code and platting regulations show an intent to <br />create lots of certain shapes and sizes. The question in this <br />case is whether the request violates-the .intent of these ordinances. <br />Thee lots would be uniform in shape. and size, are six inches short <br />of 75 feet in width, are considerably over the`10,000 square. foot <br />minimum area and should not cause. any problem for access, development <br />or drainage. In these regards, the overall intent of the Zoning <br />Code-and platting regulat-ions would not appear to be violated. <br />~by this request. The Zoning-Code does not, however, make provision <br />for one excess factor (~:.e., greater iot area) to. compensate for <br />a deficiency (i.e., inadequate lot width); Therefore, the factors <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.