My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-167
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 101-200
>
VN-167
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2007 2:39:23 PM
Creation date
2/23/2007 3:05:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
VN-167 -2 <br />1. The MacGillis &-Gibbs Company pole yard is <br />within the HRA study area <br />2. The HRA has adopted a draft of a, land use plan <br />which designates the MacGillis and Gibbs property <br />for light industrial-use, <br />3. The HRA has within this land use plan designated <br />six (6) ` project areas for possible' development or <br />redevelopment. <br />4. That it is the present intention to proceed with actual' <br />development/redevelopment in the designated project <br />areas in a sequential manner (i.e., beginning with <br />project area #1 and ending with project area #6); <br />5. That the MacGillis & Gibbs property is not included <br />in any of the already designated project areas; <br />6. That the Executive Director of the HRA has indicated <br />that, in his estimation, it would be 'a minimum of <br />15 - 20 years.before work is completed in the six <br />designated areas; <br />7. That the HRA has no stated,plans to, at any time, <br />remove the pole yards. <br />Based on this information, it would appear that itwould be <br />several years (perhaps a minimum of 15,-20 years) before the <br />applicant's property could be effected by BRA plans. We would , <br />add that the City Council has not yet adopted the HRA plan and <br />that, of course, plans of this nature are subject to change. <br />A factor that may warrant consideration is that permanent <br />use of the trailer is ?n alternative to construction of a permanent <br />building and that if this were a request to construct a new <br />office building, both a building permit and a non-conforming <br />use permit would be required. The non-conforming use permit would <br />be required as the following Type IV non-conformities have been <br />identified on the property: <br />1. Screening of outside stored materials - Section 10-130(1) <br />requires a six foot screen to shield the material or <br />goods from sight by the public-traveling on the public <br />right of way.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.