My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-171
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 101-200
>
VN-171
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2007 4:27:14 PM
Creation date
2/23/2007 4:23:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,. \ e~f' ~Tew ' Brighton <br />14 , 1977 <br />_on by Fisher, seconded ,by Werdouschegg to set R-95 <br />_~ and time for hearing for,rezoning petition R-95 Hearing <br />June 30, 1977'at 7:30 p.m. June 30 7.:30 <br />,es = 0 Hayes- carried <br />.:_on by Hardt, seconded by Senders to include consideration <br />_ landscape plan LP-36 (5potts), NC-13,(Spotts), LP-46 (Ernst). <br />,: .1 L,P°48 (Harstad) at the special council meeting June 30, :1977 <br />'7:30 p om. <br />Ia ayes - 0 Hayes- carried <br />~: <br />~- <br />i.ayor Bromander directed, with consent of the Council that R-93 <br />~.he administrative report dated June 7, 1977 re: R-93 8.25 to <br />5e received and placed in the...minutes g,58 <br />'Motion by Werdouschegg, seconded by Hardt to continue <br />nearing on R-93 ' to special council meeting, June 30.,E 1977 <br />at 7030-pom. <br />5 ayes - 0 Hayes- carried <br />VN-171 <br />Attorney stated hearing was properly called. Cobb <br />The City, Planner reviewed the planaiing report and <br />Planning Commission recommendation,.. ' <br />Councilman Werdouschegg asked whether the applicant had ,looked. 8:59 to <br />at the option of moving the houseeven closer to the road 9:15 <br />`than was requested in: order to save additional tx'ees. <br />`The Planner noted that the Planning Commission had considered the <br />':factor of the trees when making their `.recommendations., <br />Mr. Cobb, representing the.applicant, stated that he <br />preferred a lesser setback than wad requested but that <br />.:.when making the application he had decided to apply for the <br />sma lest- variance that he thought would still enable construction <br />of the house. <br />Bob Herford 3027 Spring Creek Drive, asked if it were ,normal <br />'for=the prospective ..buyer. tocirculate;a pettion,regarding.- <br />the application prior. to the public hearing. He stated that <br />since signing the petition he had changed his mind. He was <br />asked i£ there were any requirements on the distance.the house <br />must be set back from the. creek. <br />.Mayor Bromander indicated that petitions are sometimes <br />circulated. <br />It was also noted that the variance wouldhave the effect of <br />moving .the house further:.from the creek. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.