My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-171
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 101-200
>
VN-171
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2007 4:27:14 PM
Creation date
2/23/2007 4:23:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Council. Proceedings,.... <br />V City of New:Brighton <br />`` June 14, .1977 <br />Council-man Fisher asked Mr. Herford why he opposed <br />thee: application. <br />Mr. Herford stated that the construction would disturb. the <br />natural conditions:of the area and that he would prefer. <br />to see nothing built on the property. <br />Motion"by Werdouschegge seconded by Hardt to close Close <br />Hearing. <br />hea-ring VN-171 <br />5 ayes- 0 nayes- carried <br />Motion by Hardt, seconded by We'rdouschegg to <br />waive reading of resolution and adopt resolution RESOLUTION <br />entitled RES©LUTION'MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND NO. 1891 <br />APPROVING VARIANCE VN-171 .with the following findings <br />of fact: <br />1. The situation. is unique ,because of the steep <br />slope on .the lot and because the street w,as <br />constructed at,a-higher elevation than <br />anticipated: <br />2. That there is hardship because it,would be <br />uneconomical to construct a home on.`the lot with the <br />required setbacks;` - <br />3. The Council has granted.,other similar <br />requests on property with steep slopes. <br />Motion by Fisher, seconded by Hardt to amend the motion <br />to add a finding of'fact-that the granting of"the;.:application <br />would not constitute special privilege because a house <br />could: be built on the property even 'without a variance; <br />5`ayes- 0 nayes- carried <br />Motion.. by Senden, seconded by Werdouschegg to amend the motion to <br />add a finding of fact that t~?.e lc~t is located'at the end of ~ low traffic <br />volume- cul-de-sac which minimizes the impact of;ahe variance: and to <br />amend main motion to provide for 15 foot front yard building <br />set back <br />5 ayee - 0 nayes- carried <br />-Vote on main motion as amended <br />5'ayes - 0 nayes= carried <br />~~ <br />- .~ .. - , . ..s .::~ sv,, =.:''~`F ,. ~.~m i. y. -t~~.? ~, f?~Y `iy ,,d'&: ,. r.;~d',e~~zY~~.1~J'' ., &.:,. ,i, t.~~. .F:-~.~'~,a. i`d: , .:3aY'.4.:.e ~~i3i~?", ~.3~.,«'....., .wlt.u.::dG4." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.