VN-176 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r- Page 2. - VN-17b The impact of the request on adjacent property mustaTso he considered and in this case a number of factors may `be relevant. First, the applicant has indicated `that their father has no objection to the request, Second, theirfather`s home is located approximately " 310 feet from Old Hwy, 8 .which. places this home approximately 190 feet from the proposed garage., Thirdly, the applicant has indicated that arrangements: have been made to eventually transfer their father'sproperty'to the greenhouse. As such, it may be ponsible if the variance is approved, to attach a condition that-a certain amount of the adjacent property be added to the greenhouse property at time of transfer, G~Te also discussed the possibility of a smaller garage ~iut the appli-cant has .indicated .that the space is neee~ed for .efficient laadin~, It the recommends Ten is to approve we `would suggest than any conditions made part of this non-conforming use permit and building permit be conditions: of the variance. - Planning Commission-Consideration and Recommendaton(ll/15/77) VN-176, NC-25, LP-57`- P-letscher Greenhouse, Inc: - The .Director of Community Development noted that this 'item was continued from the previous meeting. Commissioner. Doyle stated-that the item. was not discussed at that .time but was s=imply- passed- over. No one appeaxed to represent :the applicant. Comrniss Toner Doyle noted than- the 10 foot driveway- north of the buil-ding was- inadequate,. _ _ The Cirector of Community Develo~*nent :noted that access to. the - proposed addition to'the;north iA~ould-also be inadequate because of this limited- space.:. He suggested that it might be possible to design the addition with doors accessing to the. east and that perhaps the. addition could also k~e `expanded in that .direction if that were necessary.