My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-186
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 101-200
>
VN-186
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2007 10:38:55 PM
Creation date
2/27/2007 4:20:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~. 1 <br />June 20, .1978 -2- <br />Chairman Brown-asked how far from the New Brighton border was <br />the road in Fridley that serves the townhouse development..: <br />Mr. Erwin stated that it was approximately 2-3 feet. <br />Chairman Brown asked if the applicant would like a delay to see <br />if .the City of Fridley could be contacted about the possibility <br />of using the existing road to serve the southern part of Mr. <br />Erwin's property. <br />Shirley Erwin stated that she was ,not interested in a delay as <br />they have already expended a great amount of money and have <br />designed the home for the proposed lot. <br />Commissioner Anderson stated that he was troubled by "future <br />development on this property and noted that the Board of Review <br />has to address problems related to the land.- Commissioner <br />Anderson stated that he saw two alternatives, one being to <br />follow the staff recommendation or, two, to have the staff contact.. <br />the City of Fridley in regard to possible joint use of the Fridley <br />road to serve. Mr. Erwin's property to .the south. <br />Shirley Erwin asked if it was possible to approve a variance for <br />• the reduced width if the variance for not having street frontage <br />was denied. <br />The City Planner stated that the Board of Review could indicate <br />their feelings to the Council in regard to this possibility. <br />Commissioner Williams stated that he saw no problem in approving <br />a variance for a lot being 73.5 feet in width as the property was <br />overall very large, but that he was concerned that the lot did <br />not have frontage. on a public street. <br />Motion by Anderson,. seconded by Brown, to waive the reading and <br />adopt a RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING <br />PARTIAL APPROVAL OF VN-186. <br />4 ayes - 0 nayes - carried.. <br />Motion by Brown, seconded by Williams, to indicate to the City <br />Council-that the preferred subdivision would be to extend the <br />proposed lot to front on Spring Creek Drive and to note that <br />such a subdivision may require a jog in -the western property -line <br />or some form of easement to provide sufficient room-for. the lot <br />on which the existing home is located. <br />4 ayes - 0 naves - carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.