My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-186
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 101-200
>
VN-186
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2007 10:38:55 PM
Creation date
2/27/2007 4:20:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />New Brighton Planning Commission <br />Board of Review <br />~ Regular Meeting <br />' June 20, 1978 <br />The meeting was called to order by Chairman-Brown at 7:3.0 P.M. <br />Present: Brown, Anders-on, Medved, Williams <br />Absent• Lang <br />Also Present: City Planner W.inkels <br />Approval of Minutes - May 22, 1978 <br />Motion by Anderson, seconded by Williams to approve the minutes <br />of May 22, 1978 with theamendment_that Commissioner Williams <br />name be deleted from the list of those absent .` <br />4 ayes - 0 Hayes - carried <br />LP-67, S-H Realty <br />The City Planner stated that he had nothing to add to the staff <br />'L report. <br />Mr. Scarp, applicant, was present to answer questions.: <br />Motion by Brown, seconded by Williams to approve LP-6? subject <br />to conformance with site and landscape plans submitted . <br />4 ayes - 0 Hayes - carried <br />^~...~ <br />VN-186, Erwin <br />The City Planner reviewed his report noting-that .the applicants <br />would be submitting a subdivision report in the near future, <br />Mrs. Shirley Erwin, applicant, was present to answer questions. <br />Mrs. Erwin stated that when her father=in-law had originally <br />contacted the City he was told about the width requirements <br />but that he was not informed-about having to have frontage on a <br />street. Mrs.. Erwin stated that they had also just received an <br />appraisal of the lot which only now showed the lot divided. <br />according to-City requirements.- Mrs. Erwin stated that they have <br />already invested a large amount of money and that they cannot <br />afford to purchase tha additional property all the way up to <br />Spring: Creek .Drive. <br />Chairman Brown asked Mr. Erwin,- property owner, what he would <br />do with the property to thewest of the lot he is proposing to <br />sell to his son and daughter-in-law. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.