VN-191 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

f l ~ { - ADD»NDtJM TO A,~~LI^,.A:~TT~S STA"E•~TT a~ JASON Fay V.~.RI.A;.~1CE: This variance is requested becaus~an excessive amount of Land value for one single family home is held under-the current dotting. The ~rooerty is unique in that it is considerably longer than it is ~,~ride. Its current aubroxi?nate dimentions are a width of 138. a7 feet, a length of 387: feet, and an area of 53,433 square feet (1.23 acres). Deuending on whether the water at the east end of the property (Long Lake) is at a high level or low level, the amount of land out. of the water ranges from 25,957 _ __- square feet (.60 acres) to 34,518 square feet (.79 acres). Stith the __.~~~~eh3~~=~~t -_~a-~e-s~c~ Viand- -this amot~.~t $~ --~a.nc~ _ for_ one single-- _- - -- - .._.- ~ _ -= -- - .ems ---_ ---`-f}-}y-ho~ts-~ets-vroh'Ihtti4ely e~~ensive. --- -- _ _. - .~--~ _---- h~ -~e~a-=a~~rese~--~rl-o~-elan wauZd divide the _Aroperty- into.. tw,o- -narcQ.ls _ --.= _ . _ -._ _ _ _ ,~;; 1 Ch .~~au1~~e~.t or sassed all other rsgniremeizts other than w _ . _~ ~ ~- _. _ - proposed= p3:~--~r~u'~d divide the land into two rectangular parcels, _one _ - - -- - - rt .-_~e~ ---taXr.3~-7,~eet.__an~the-.other 6&__feet X_ 337.-feet wfth _them having _. z-- -~-- _ - __ __ areas respectively of 27~ 364 sv_uare feet x.64 acres -and 23, 54~ square - --~`- _._ -:_. feet (.59 acres. These are 279 per-cent and 254 aer cent of the-mini- -- mum area requirement. Even using the a-~ount of land out of the water; - -- gives a range of land area at high water Level of 13,536 square feet. _ _- _._-. {,31 acre) to 18,0 square feet (.41 acre) at low water level for the _ - =- larger lot and a range of 12,403 square feet (.2g acre) to i&,504--square - - - feet {.38 Acf~e) for the smaller plot. So at high water level, the two - lots would be 135 per cent and 124 uer cent of the mini'au~t aize require- went and at low water level would be 180 per cent and 165 per cent of the - ream*ement. _ If split into two lots, this proposed plot would be consistent with -t-he_ _ _, --.-~-------~----- neighborhood. inhere are many lots in the area that are Less than the - 75 foot minimum with me.ny of thew being only 50 to 55 feet in width. ~ `- ---- - - - .~ 2'he unioue circu-~stance applying to this pro-~erty is that there is an - - _. excessive a~aount of very valuable lake shore lard that as one unit is- - -- -- - imnractically expensive. mhe s'^.a*~e of the land being extremely deev makes the normal width requirements a hardship. The hardship created is an extreme one because the width is so close to meetir~ the exact letter of the width reouirement and with the width requirement being m'_ased by only 3 feet and 9 feat on the two lots respectively.