VN-196 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r RESOLUTION D10. STATE OF ~'~lINNESOTA COUPITY OF RAMSEY CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING VARIANCE APPLICATION VN-196 WHEREAS, an application for a variance VN-196 has been made by Mr. Clirit`Carlson for property at 131 512th Avenue N.W. to permit the subdivision of property having less than the required width and not having frontage on a public street, and WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for VN-196 .was filed with the City October 10, 1978; 2. That the Board of Review heard and reviewed the application at its meetings on October 17, 1978, November 16, 1978 and November 21 ,. 1978; 3. That the City Council pursuant to published and mailed notices, held a public hearing on November 28, 1978 to consider the application.- All persons present were given an opportunity to be heard. 4. That the written comments and analysis of the Director of Community Development and City Planner, the Planning Commission minutes, and all person's statemen made at the public hearing were considered. 'NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of clew Brighton that the following Findings of Fact are made in respect to VN-196. 1. That the property is uniquely situated adjacent to Long Lake and at the end of two (2) publicly dedicated and improved streets. 2. That the proposed lots while being less than the required width would have substantially greater. amounts of square footage and the amounts of land area above the water elevation would also exceed the 10,000 square foot minimum requirement for a R-1 District. 3. That the. dedication of street right-of-way provides the .city with the opportunity if desired to provide a public street~to adjacent vacant/undeveloped property to the west and north of the property in question. 4. That providing the lot is properly planned and developed drainage should not be a problem. 5. The construction of a single family home on the propos southern lot should not have a detrimental effect on adjacent property or property values. 6. That the property has some unique characteristics in terms. of location and in terms of shape and topography with a considerable slope from the proposed house location to the lake. 7. -That the impact or effect of the lot width deviation is lessened as a result of the increased lot area. 8. ~~~'~ P,`r~k o'~ p~~~~