VN-196 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

«• ~ , Octob?r 10, 1y79 AD^_Vit.d PO :~ P7~IC:~T~S S''A':'~~'r';`;T ~F ?~~SC:d C~ 4~ I:z:.?C~ ~~e in~ena t0 c~rre;•t the ~?^Obie.'.1 wish t::e +.?a0 new lots r~o. aV:^_g s•,r°- ficient fronta_e on public street by dedicating (or givi^g the cit;; the option to ::aye r~:'_icatec at ar.;,- tire, at your c?~oice) a strip of land tzo to 17 feet wi e "long tre west side of this ^ro:;erty. '^:as is in a~c.ition to the eight feet that has been orevioasly set asice sor public road ,?u~-;ores end ~.~oulc? give a total of 25 feet set asic.e for *~ublic road nur~oses. This would orovice lznd for the eest ::^.alf of a nub_ic road that could. be out in e.t any time at~ter the other half is aauired. It the land is not ta:~en for public pt2r^oses i:a.,ediate?,~, I propose that the north. lot be allo~•~Pd access accrosa this 17 foot strip by a private easement until the dedication takes place. These variances are reouested because an excessive mount of land ~s for one single family home is held under the current plotting. The property is unioue in that it is considerably longer than it is wic.e. Its current aporoximAte dimentions are a width oP 138.07 feet, a length oP 387 feet and an area of 53,433 square tePt (1.23 acres). This is an excessive a^~ount of land for one single family hone. The sew pro^.osed plot plan ~.ould divide the oronerty into two parcels which would meet or exceed all other requirements other than width. The pro;~osed plat would divide the land into two rectangular parcels ~•~hich would be 70.3 feet by 397 feet and 67.77 feet by 397 .feet with areas respectively of 27,206 square feet (.62 acres) and 2E,227 aeuare feet (. 50 acres). These are 272 per cent and 2E2 per cent of the minimum area requirement. If split into two lots, -this :~ronosed plot wouldbe consistent with t'r_e aeiohborrood. There are many lets in the area :hat are less t^an the 75 foot minimum with many of them being only 50 to 55 feet in width. The imia ue circumstance aool,ring to this oronerty is that there is an excessive a•^ount of very valLable lakesrore land .that as one unit is impractical. The shape of t'_:e Iard being extremely deep makes the nor- mal width reauire*~ent a hardship. The hardship created is an extreme one bA~use one width is so close to ~aeetir:g the exact letter of the width requirement and with the width rep uirement beins ^issed by only 7,2 feet and. 4.7 feet on the two loss res_:,ectively. The current urban Land useabe is a wasteful one.