VN-196 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

RESOLUTION DIO. STATE OF MITJTdESOTA COUTJTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON RESOLUTION MAKITIG FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING VARIANCE APPLICATION VN-196 WHEREAS, an application fora variance VN-196 has-been made by Mr. Clint Carlson for property at 1315 12th Avenue N.W. to permit the subdivision of property having less than the required width and not having frontage on a public. street, and WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for VN-196 was filed with the City October 10, 1978; 2. That the Board of Review heard and reviewed the application at its meetings on October 17, 1978, November 16, 1978 and November 21, 1978; 3. That the City Council pursuant to published and mailed notices,. held a public hearing on November 28, 1978 to consider the application. AlI persons present were given an opportunity to be heard. 4. That the written comments and analysis of the Director of Community Development and City Planner, the Planning Commission minutes, and all person's statement: made at the public hearing were. considered. NOW THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by-the City Council of New Erighton that the .following Findings of .Fact are made in respect to VN-196. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. That the property is uniquely situated adjacent to Longl Lake and at the end of two (2) publicly dedicated and improved streets. That the proposed lots. while being less than the required width would have substantially greater amounts of square footage and the amounts of land area above { the water elevation would also exceed the 10,000 square foot minimum requirement for a R-1 District. That the. dedication of street right-of-way provides the city with the opportunity if desired to provide a public street to adjacent vacant/undeveloped property. to the west and north of the property in question. That providing-the lot is properly planned and developed drainage should not be a problem. ~ The construction of a single family home on the proposed southern lot should not have a detrimental effect on adjacent property or property values. That the property has some unique characteristics in terms of location and in terms of shape and topography ~ with a considerable slope from the proposed house ~ location to the lake. I 7. That the impact or effect of the Iot width deviation is lessened as a result of the increased lot area.