Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />July 28, 1987 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />In response to Gunderman's and Benke's concern that some residents <br />did not receive the final letter (due to vacations, etc.), Proper <br />indicated residents should still contact his office if they have <br />any questions or concerns. <br /> <br />Motion by Williams, seconded by Blomquist, to APPROVE STAFF RECOM- <br />MENDATION ORDERING THE APPROPRIATE DEDUCT ($1,500.00) FROM THE <br />CONTRACTOR FOR REPAIRING THE AESTHETICALLY DAMAGED AREAS IN THE <br />PROJECT, INCLUDING THE COST OF EVALUATING STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AND <br />INVESTIGATE AND ANALYZE THE VISUAL ASPECTS OF THE PROJECT (BRAUN <br />ENGINEERING TESTING, ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON AND ASSOCIATES, AND ADDI- <br />TIONAL STAFF TIME); TO REQUIRE AN EXTENDED (ONE ADDITIONAL YEAR) <br />WARRANTY PERIOD IN THE CONTRACT; AND THE REQUIREMENT OF A PERFOR- <br />MANCE BOND IN AN AMOUNT TO BE DETERMINED BY STAFF. <br /> <br />In response to Gunderman1s question, Benke indicated the two-year <br />period begins from the time of acceptance of the project, which <br />occurs when final payment is made which, as LeFevere stated, is <br />the also the end of any negotiations. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Kelley briefly reviewed staff report concerning an ordinance <br />amending City Code Section 29-1. <br /> <br />Motion by Brandt, seconded by Gunderman, tp WAIVE THE READING AND <br />HOLD THE FIRST READING OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 29-1 <br />OF THE NEW BRIGHTON CITY CODE REGARDING TRAFFIC. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br /> <br />Kelley briefly reviewed recent legislation which affects the <br />city's current code; and noted the proposed ordinance amendment <br />has been reviewed by the City Attorney. <br /> <br />Motion by Williams, seconded by Blomquist, to WAIVE THE READING <br />AND HOLD THE FIRST READING OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS <br />6-95, 17-5, AND 29-1 OF THE NEW BRIGHTON CITY CODE REGARDING EN- <br />FORCEMENT BY PERSONS OTHER THAN POLICE OFFICERS. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br /> <br />Locke briefly reviewed staff report concerning the proposed amend- <br />ment of Sections 8-410 and 8-420 of the City Code regarding non- <br />conforming uses. <br /> <br />III <br /> <br />Motion by Blomquist, seconded by Gunderman, to WAIVE THE READING <br />AND HOLD THE FIRST READING OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS <br />8-410 AND 8-420 OF THE CITY CODE REGARDING NON-CONFORMING USES. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br /> <br />Locke reviewed staff report concerning a request for a special use <br />permit, density variance, and site plan review to construct six <br />townhouses in an R-2 district; and indicated the Planning Commis- <br />sion recommends approval of site plan and special use permit, but <br />denied the variance. <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />Ordinance Amendment <br />Section 29-1, <br />Regulations <br />adopted (1st rdg.) <br />Report 87-185 <br /> <br />Ordinance Amendment <br />Section 6-95 <br />Section 17-5 <br />Section 29-1 <br />(Citat"ions, En- <br />forcement, and <br />Regulations <br />adopted (1st rdg.) <br />Report 87-186 <br /> <br />Ordinance Amendment <br />Section 8-410 <br />Section 8-420 <br />Non-Conforming Use <br />( 1 s t rdg.) <br />Report 87-187 <br /> <br />SP-142/VN-256/LP-214 <br />McCa lla <br />Report 87-188 <br />