Laserfiche WebLink
`VN-210 <br />Page #2 <br />Lt appears since the applicant has adhered to the conditions <br />established by the Council in 19.74 that the warrants for the <br />variance are present in terms of rri~Cimum usage of the. pad and <br />safety _factors, and that .the fence does not have any substantial <br />negative impact on surrounding properties, that the request for <br />VN-210 should be approved. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION 'AND RECOMMENDATION <br />EXTRACT FROM. MINUTES <br />BOARD OF REVIEW <br />REGULAR MEETING- <br />AUGUST 22, 1979 <br />Staff reported that the applicant could not attend the meeting. <br />Commissioner Williams was concerned that presently the area is under- <br />developed and that. future residents could be: opposed to the fence... <br />Motion by Williarns, second-by Livingston to recommend approvalof <br />VN-210 subject to'the following conditions: <br />1. That no screening material be placed in the chain <br />link fence to obstruct vision; and <br />2. That the boulevard and land adjacent to the fence <br />be maintained; and. <br />3. That the variance be reviewed in 5 years. <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, motion carried. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION- <br />Staff recornrnends that UN-21.0 be approved. by waiving the reading and <br />adopting the attached resolution. <br />l certify that !have <br />reviewed this report and <br />have: <br /> <br /> No comments to <br /> supplement. the <br /> recommendation.. <br />~^-1 <br />L_.1 Attached written <br /> comments to <br /> supplement the <br /> r ommendation. <br />tr1 "I ~t ' <br />.Date :City M ~r <br />an M. Archer <br />ty Planner <br />i <br />t. <br />