Laserfiche WebLink
VN-210 <br />.Page #2 <br />It appears since the applicant has adhered to the .conditions J <br />established by the Council. in 1974, that the warrants .for the <br />variance-are present in terms of m9 xi-mum usage of the pad and <br />safety factors, and .that. the fence does not have any substantial <br />negative impact on surrounding properties, that the request for <br />VN-210 should be approved. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION-CONSIDERATION AND RECOMMENDATION <br />EXTRACT FROM MINUTES <br />BOARD OF REVIEW <br />REGULAR MEETING <br />AUGUST 22, 1979 <br />Staff reported that.. the applicant. could not attend the meeting. <br />Commissioner Williams was concerned ,that presently the area is under- <br />developed and that. future residents could be opposed to the fence. <br />Motion by Williams-,.second by Livirigston to recommend approval of <br />VN-210 subject to the following conditions: <br />• 1. That no screening material be placed in the chain <br />link fence toyobstruct vision; and <br />2. That the boulevard and land adjacent to the fence <br />be maintained; and <br />3. That the variance be reviewed in 5 years. <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, motion carried. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff recommends that VN-210 be approved by waiving the reading and <br />adopting the attached resolution. <br />l certify that I nave <br />reviewed this report and <br />have: <br />No comments to a n M . Archer . <br />supptement the _ ty P l a n n e r <br />~~---~1t recommendation, <br />iLJ Attached written ~ - <br />comments to <br />supplement the <br />r ommendation, - <br />Date City_M `~r <br />