My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-210
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 201-300
>
VN-210
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2007 7:21:22 AM
Creation date
3/5/2007 1:17:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• - <br />RESOLUTION NO <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA <br />-STATE OF MINNESOTA <br />CITY -0F NEW BRIGHTON. <br />RESOLUTION MAKING FIN-DINGS OF FACT ANU APPROVING APPLICATION <br />FOR VARIANCE, UN-2.10 <br />WHEREAS, An application for a variance :entitled VN-210 <br />has been .made by Charles Bergman, 299 Oakwood Drive to allow <br />a: fence 10 feet in height in the front and side yard of a <br />residential site. <br />WHEREAS, The procedural history of the application is as <br />follows: <br />i <br />1. That. an application for Variance, VN-210 was. filed ' <br />with the City of New Brighton on July 13,,1979. t <br />Z. That such application was reviewed by the New Brighton <br />P1ann.ing Commission Board of Review on August 22, 1979. <br />• 3. That the City Council, .pursuant. to publishredand <br />mailed notices, held a public hearing on September ll, ', <br />1979, allpersons's present at the hearing were given <br />an opportunity to be heard. <br />4. The written comments and analysis of the City staff, <br />the Planning Commission minutes and recommendations <br />were considered. <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That- the New Brighton City <br />Council makes the following Findings of Fact in respect to <br />VN-210: <br />1. That the applicant has not obstructed vision by <br />using screening material in the fence; <br />2. That the applicant has maintained the boulevard; <br />3. That the fence has not adversely: affected traffic <br />flow in that area; <br />4. That the fence provides maximum usage of the existing <br />concrete pad; <br />5. That the fence provides safety to those person's. <br />using the concrete pad; <br />6.-That the fence does-not have a substantial negative- <br />impact- on adjacent properties. <br />BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the application for <br />VN-2T0 is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.