Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-2- <br />stantial investiment and it would be a hardship after only 5 <br />years of usage to have to remove thefence. <br />It appears since the applicant has adhered to the conditions <br />established by the Council in 1974, that the warrants for the <br />variance are present in terms, of maximum usage of the pad and <br />safety factors, and that-the fence does not have any substantial <br />negative impact on surrounding properties, that the request for <br />VN-210 should be approved: <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff recommends that the Board recommend approval of VN-210, <br />Bergman by waiving the reading and adopting the attached resolution: <br />~~ ~ i '! <br />an M. .Archer <br />ty Planner <br />