Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />May 12, 1987 <br /> <br />Locke indicated in the past two weeks they had been unable to find <br />a low-cost effective way to handle the problems, but the viola- <br />tions need to be dealt with, noting there are some real hazards <br />that need to be addressed particularly before the heating season <br />begins. <br /> <br />With regard to the list of violations, Gunderman asked for recom- <br />mendations regarding the timing and severity of the violations, <br />noting No. 10 seems to necessitate immediate action. Gunderman <br />further stated that, from an inspector's point of view and from a <br />safety point of view, we are still facing the same issues and <br />asked for a recommendation of a phasing in process. <br /> <br />Locke stated Beisswenger has tried, either by operation or use of <br />the building, to alleviate some of the problems; a few things have <br />become potentially hazardous and staff and Beisswenger were not <br />able to develop a compromise. <br /> <br />In response to Gunderman1s inquiry regarding a cost factor on Item <br />No. 10, Nelson estimated it could run as high as $10,000. <br /> <br />Blomquist asked for background dates of inspections (when they <br />. occurred and when the city became advised of the violations). <br />Nelson advised an inspection on February 5, 1987, resulted in the <br />finding of the twelve violations; on February 19, 1987, a letter <br />was delivered to Beisswenger; the city received a letter of appeal <br />from Beissweng~r on March 17, 1987; and on March 23, 1987, the <br />city sent a letter to Beisswenger indicating we would be holding <br />the first hearing on April 14, 1987, which was continued to April <br />28, 1987; and again to this evening. <br /> <br />Blomquist asked for the date of a previous inspection that did not <br />find any violations; Nelson responded he did not find any inspec- <br />tions for Beisswenger Hardware that listed no violations. <br /> <br />Benke stated over the years the Fire Marshall has pointed out <br />violations to Beisswenger; only some remedies were applied because <br />development possibilities have been percolating for a long time. <br />We know there are problems and we need a plan of action to address <br />the problems because we do not want a tragedy. <br /> <br />With regard to a letter from our City Attorney referencing the <br />city's liability when the city is aware that hazardous situations <br />exist, Blomquist stated the record indicates the city has known of <br />the conditions for a long time. <br /> <br />Benke stated Beisswenger is having a hard time with a long-term <br />solution, but the city needs a short-term plan of action. <br /> <br />Williams suggested the council consider the use of Ramsey County <br />Dispute Resolution Center to mediate this matter which could take <br />into account the time lines with the developer, the city's lia- <br />bility, and the pinch Beisswenger finds himself in. By going <br />through that process no one gives up any rights and Williams sug- <br />gested it would simply be a means of getting people together to <br />see if some type of an agreement can be resolved. <br /> <br />Page 9 <br />