VN-214 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

,~ UN-214 Page #2 The zoning code does not contain a provision for public park dedication so the only other alternative without reducing the number of units is the application for a variance. It seems that there is some merit for consideration of the variance because this is certainly a unique circumstance. The variance appears to be totally consistent with the stated purposes of the PRD ordinance because it will promote the efficient use of the land and would promote public health and welfare. PLANNING COr•1h1ISSI0N CONSIDERATION AND RECOh1r~lENDATION Sta-ff reviewed their report noting that the variance was necessary since the density permitted on the property retained by the applicant is less than permitted by the P.R.D. recently con- sidered: Staff noted that this application allows for the applicant to deed the park property to the City. Mr. Dave Swenson, area resident, was present, and questioned if the number of units allowed on the site had changed. Chairman Leverkuhn stated there were no changes to the density previously discussed. • Motion by Leverkuhn, seconded by Williams to amend the staff recommended resolution in the following manner: 1. That a #4 be added to the procedural history to read: "That the P.R.D, proposal being considered shows a dedication of 4.93 acres for-park land." 2. That #2 under NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED be amended to read: "That the Development site is 4.05 acres." 3. That #3 under NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED be amended by substituting."development" for "total" and changing "48" to "22" 4. That #4 under NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED be amended by deleting the words "consistent and". Vote on amendments, 5 Ayes - 0 rlayes, Motion Carried Motion by Williams, seconded by Lang to waive the reading and adopt the amended RESOLUTION MAKIrdG FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMh1ENDING APPROVAL OF APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE, UN-214. _ _ 5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried •