My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1987-04-14
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Minutes - City Council
>
Minutes 1987
>
1987-04-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2005 6:08:32 AM
Creation date
8/10/2005 2:43:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />1 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />April 14, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />Motion by Gunderman, seconded by Williams, to AUTHORIZE THE CITY <br />MANAGER AND THE POLICE CHIEF TO SIGN AN ACCREDITATION AGREEMENT <br />WITH THE COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES <br />AND TO PAY THE APPROPRIATE FEES. <br /> <br />Brandt asked if the city has adequate staff to do what needs to be <br />done; Kelley responded affirmatively. <br /> <br />Schmidt stated the down side is that if one does not meet the cri- <br />teria there will be a let-down; but the department would not be <br />going through the process if there were no positive benefits. A <br />concern of Schmidt's was a need for additional funds beyond the <br />normal budget for personnel. Kelley estimated the work could be <br />done in the confines of normal staff time; however, upon approval <br />and execution of the document, the Commission will send a self- <br />assessment package; and after reviewing that package he will be <br />able to more fully answer Schmidt's question. <br /> <br />Benke asked if, after the self-assessment work has been completed, <br />we could withdraw if the future costs appear to be too great; <br />Kelley stated we could. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br /> <br />With regard to the staff report concerning the sale of refunding <br />bonds, Egan stated the concept being recommended is possible be- <br />cause the current interest rates are lower than the rates we have <br />on the city's bonds; we are looking at refunding structures, two <br />of which we will be using (current and cross-over). The savings <br />to the city is the lowering of the interest bonds (over $240,000 <br />on a gross savings basis). <br /> <br />Sale of <br />Refunding <br />Bonds <br />Report 87-94 <br />Resolution 87-40 <br /> <br />Egan continued that in structuring the proposal, special concern <br />was paid to the amount of cash available because of the impact on <br />savings; in handling two water-related bonds, the cash requirement <br />will be kept to a minimum which will minimize savings but will <br />still be a good method. Staff is asking council for approval of <br />the concept; the sale of the bonds would then be on the May 12, <br />1987, council agenda. However, if interest rates are not advan- <br />tageous at that time, we will postpone or cancel the award of the <br />sale. The cost to the city would be about $4,700 for preparing an <br />official statement and receiving a bond rating. <br /> <br />Egan further explained the savings reach back to the taxpayer <br />through reduced cost of their debt levy; and indicated this is an <br />opportune time for the city. <br /> <br />Jim Casserly, Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc., compared the <br />various options that were considered and explored. <br /> <br />For clarification, Schmidt asked if the water bonds relate to when <br />the wells were found to be contaminated; Egan responded affirma- <br />tively. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.