1987-03-10 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I I I Council Meeting Minutes March 10, 1987 Council Business Matilla briefly reviewed the staff report concerning a non-con- forming use permit, special use permit, and site plan review. The Planning Commission held a hearing on February 17, 1987, approv- ing the truck weigh-scale and conditional items as outlined in the proposed resolution. Benke noted in both the Planning Commission comments and in the staff report, there have been several occasions in the past of various permits and approvals to which there have been conditions attached. Because not all conditions were met and went unnoticed by the city, Benke asked who should be responsible for monitoring conditions. Matilla stated the normal procedure is to follow-up on approved site plans on a monthly basis and to coordinate the site plan to be sure they are complying with landscaping plans, etc. Benke stated once everything is in place, we do not go back to be sure the landscaping is being maintained. Matilla stated that if his department notices anything, they contact the owner, but normally anything out of order would be reported on a com- plaint basis. Matilla agreed it would be an excellent idea to monitor sites on computer. As council is aware of another site plan condition that has not been resolved, Gunderman stated he would like to review the moni- toring system at another council meeting. Benke suggested over the next few months council and staff should be considering the strategy of relying on complaints instead of routine enforcement. Brandt asked if staff made an inquiry as to how long it will take the applicant to bring items into conformance; Matilla indicated the applicant has expressed a willingness to remedy the situation which will be completed prior to a building permit being issued. With regard to the areas of the drive to be sprayed, it does not seem like there is a complete path through the site and Benke asked if any followup had been done in that area. Matilla responded affirmatively, and stated he met with the appli- cant on that issue today and the applicant who will show a revised plan; Matilla continued the applicant indicates after the permit is used, the area could be expanded even further by June of this year. Page Two Council Business McGillis & Gibbs: NC-78, SP-139, and -207 Report 87-68 Resolution 87-25 Resolution 87-26