Laserfiche WebLink
RESOL~~ii!J"' '~'0 <br />,-• ~ ` <br />JEG~ BRIOF;TO~ PL.4P!"!I"?C COP'hiISSIGh! <br />RESOLUTIO(~! ~°.AKI~~C FIP!"I~~GS OF FP.CT P.^,^ RECO"'. "4E'dOING APPROVAL OF <br />VARIA~JCE APPLICATIOrd, VF~~-2?5 <br />krHEREAS, an application for a variance, V~J-225 has been madE <br />by the City of h:e4~~ Brighton to construct a well house with less <br />than the rec!uired setback; and <br />WHEREAS, the procec!ural history of the application is as <br />follows: <br />1. That an application for a variance, V;,-225 was filed witt <br />the City on !lecember 1, lgg2. <br />2. That tie Planning Commission, pursuant to published and <br />mailed notices, held a public hearing on December 21, <br />1982, all persons present at the hearing -Nere given an <br />opportunity to be heard. <br />~r0:-' TN~~~FOP,~ BE IT RESOL~'E~ by the Planning Commission <br />that the folloi~!inq Findings of Fact are made in respect to 1'^!-22! <br />T. That the property is zoned I-1, Light Industrial; <br />2. That the well construction is a result of a water <br />contamination problem facing t"e City creating a <br />unique circumstance; <br />3. T;~at the City's construction location of the structure <br />is strictly regulated by the ~"innesota health Oepartr;ent <br />and the undue hardship facing the Citv would be to <br />purchase additional property to meet the 60 feet setback <br />requirement in the zoning code; <br />-. T"at public facility structures are allowed in <br />residential districts and is therefore not considered <br />by the zoning-code of being a typical industrial use; <br />5. That if subject buil~ino ~~~a,s constructed on residentially <br />zoned property next to a residential district that the <br />60 foot setback ~•~oulc! not be applicable; <br />5. That the proposes! building will have a 50 foot setback <br />and the adjacent structures on the adjoining property <br />are apartment garages; and <br />7. That the 10 foot variance will therefore not adversely <br />affect adjacent properties. <br />BE IT FURTHER RESGLl~E^ that the application V.<-2?_5 is and <br />hereby recommen:;ed for approval. <br />~.dopted t~is day of <br />19r% <br />over S. !!illiams, Chairman <br />Joan ". arc"~r, City Plainer <br />