Laserfiche WebLink
LP-147 <br />Page #2 <br />ANALYSIS <br />Proposal is for a proposed office building, two stories in height that <br />would be constructed in the southeastern corner of the site and on th.e <br />plans is shown to be the first phase of the structure that would.even- <br />tually connect in with the existing concrete block structure that <br />occupies the property. The existing structure on the property is <br />currently used for residential purposes. <br />The plans submitted are complete with the exception that the parking <br />and driving area is not classified on the plans being asphalt or con- <br />crete. -Further the plans do not indicate that the parking area'and <br />driveway will have concrete curbing. Finally, the applicant by his <br />letter is requesting that the north: side of the building be something <br />other than a decorative block for reasons of th.e future expansion. <br />The applicant by his letter and by his drawing indicates that they are <br />orientating the building to the west and consider the west to be the <br />front entrance to this building,therefore, this area is provided with <br />the required decorative block for exterior treatment. Nevertheless, <br />the city ordinances require on street sides of properties buildings <br />should have a decorative block or decorative metal panel finish. As <br />a result it appears to me that the options would be to either condition <br />the approval of the building permit on providing the appropriate exterior <br />treatment or providing as a condition that the exterior treatment be <br />provided at some future date. If the exterior treatment were required <br />as a condition of building permit approval the applicant would always <br />have the opportunity to apply to the Planning Commission and City <br />Council for a variance to delay the required exterior treatment. <br />EXISTING RESIDENTIAL USE <br />The existing residential is classified as a Type II Non-Conforming Use <br />by the zoning code. Type II non-conformities are regulated by Section <br />8-440. Reviewing the regulations for Type II non-conformities•it is my <br />opinion that the residential use can exist in its present state even <br />with the new office building constructed on the site. The Type II regu- <br />lations are very clear that any reuse of the property for something other <br />than the residential use will have to be something that conforms to the <br />B-3.zoning regulations. The non-conforming regulations indicate that <br />non-conformities should be discouraged to the extent possible. While <br />the use would in fact remain under this proposal my opinion is that with <br />the establishment of the more dominant commercial use on this site I <br />think this existing residential use will in fact be somewhat discouraged. <br />a <br />CONCLUSION <br />With the addition of the missing information as noted above the <br />application conforms with zoning code requirements. The proposal if <br />developed according to plan with future expansion and if maintained <br />should be an asset to this <br />property.