My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-233
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 201-300
>
VN-233
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 4:54:26 AM
Creation date
3/13/2007 11:48:14 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RESOLUTION N0. <br />NEW BRIGHTON PLANNING COMMISSION <br />RESOLUTLON MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF <br />VARIANCE VN-233. <br />WHEREAS, an application for VN-233 has been made by <br />Gregory and Deborah Meyers to allow less than the required <br />front yard setback; <br />WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as <br />follows: <br />1. That. an application for a variance VN-233 was <br />filed with the City on April 30, 1.984. <br />2. That the. Planning Commission, pursuant.to. published <br />and mailed notices, held a public hearing an May 15, <br />1984, and all persons present at the .hearing were <br />given an opportunity to be heard. <br />NOW .THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission that <br />the fol]owing Findings of Fact are made in respect to VN-233.; <br />~} 1. That the property is zoned R-1, Single Family <br />~~ res i denti a1 . <br /> 2. That the required front yard setback in R-1 <br /> zoning districts is 30 feet. <br /> 3. That the applicant is requesting a 17-foot variance <br /> to construct a residential garage within the front <br /> yard setback. <br /> 4. That the property is one of the original City plats. <br /> 5. That the site is in an area that was originally <br />j platted for cottage deve]opment with small lots. <br /> 6. That the size of the ]ot and location of the exist- <br />" ing home do not allow construction of a double car <br /> within the front yard setback requirements. <br /> 7. That undue hardship would result if .the applicant <br /> could not construct a double car garage. <br /> 8. That the layout of the new garage and driveway <br />~ will greatly improve the existing site.. <br />j 9. That the applicant has demonstrated unique and un- <br />'~ usual circumstances and undue hardship for the <br />~~ variance. <br /> BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the application for VN-233 is <br />;'.and <br />i~ hereby recommended for approval. <br />;Adopted this 15th day of May 1984. <br />Roger S. Wil Tams, Chairman <br /> <br />Brenda A. Krueger, City Planner <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.