My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-243
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 201-300
>
VN-243
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2007 2:25:15 PM
Creation date
3/13/2007 1:09:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
X , August 16, 1985 <br />THERMO-KING <br />VN-243 <br />PURPOSE <br />To reconsider denial of a previous variance request to allow a seven <br />foot fence in a front yard. <br />BACKGROUND <br />APPLICANT: Thermo King Sales & Service, Inc. <br />Representative: John Jorissen <br />LOCATION: <br />ZONING: <br />MAXIMUM FENCE HEIGHT <br />ALLOWED IN FRONT YARD: <br />REQUESTED FENCE HEIGHT <br />Thl CDAKIT VADII⢠<br />CODE REQUIREMENTS: <br />1951 Old Highway 8 <br />I-1, Light Industrial <br />3'1/2 Feet <br />7 Feet (6 foot chain link plus <br />1 foot of barbed wire) <br />Section.4-540 a.b. & C., fence <br />Section 6-400 Fences <br />Section 8-210 thru 8-230, Variance <br />PREVIOUS PLANNING <br />COMMISSION ACTION: <br />PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: <br />In December of 1984 the Planning <br />Commission recommended denial of <br />Thermo King's request for a variance <br />(VN-241) to allow a seven-foot fence <br />in a front yard (see attached minutes <br />and resolution). <br />In December of 1984 the City Council <br />denied Thermo King's request for a <br />variance to allow a seven-foot fence <br />in a front yard (see attached minutes <br />and resolution). <br />STANDARDS FOR A VARIANCE <br />Section 8-230 of the zoning code states that variances may be granted <br />where the applicant is able to prove that the following conditions exist: <br />1. Undue Hardship <br />2. Unique Circumstances <br />3. Applying to the Property <br />4. Conformance With The Comprehensive Plan <br />5. Not Detrimental to Adjacent Property or Public As A Whole
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.